Joined
·
409 Posts
Watched it this morning, couldnt believe they compared the Captur with the Clio, even Renault dont do that and they make them. They could'nt even work the ventilation ducts saying that the Captur was the only car they knew were this wa'snt possible. They said it rolled more than the Clio, yes because its taller. They mentioned it was slower than the Clio because its heavier. They mentioned the seat covers but not the split level adjustable sliding boot capacity. They also didnt mention the zero rated road tax or 62mpg on the model they tested.
They did give it a reasonable score 28/40 and did like its looks.
Why it wasnt compared with the Peugot 2008, the Juke or the Ecosport I'll never know. It was a waste of time and poor automotive journalism.
They did give it a reasonable score 28/40 and did like its looks.
Why it wasnt compared with the Peugot 2008, the Juke or the Ecosport I'll never know. It was a waste of time and poor automotive journalism.